ArrowArtboardCreated with Sketch.Title ChevronTitle ChevronIcon FacebookIcon LinkedinIcon Mail ContactPath LayerIcon MailPositive ArrowIcon Print
Indo-Pacific

Xi's playbook for China is different from what U.S. thinks, scholars say

Taiwan, tech and nuclear policies all related to domestic politics

A model of the LY-70 air defense missile weapon system is displayed at Airshow China in Zhuhai, China in 2021. Beijing's military buildup is partly aimed at convincing the U.S. to accept China as a major power, analysts say.     © Reuters

WASHINGTON -- When Adm. Philip Davidson told Congress in March 2021 that China may take military action against Taiwan "in the next six years," 2027 became known as the "Davidson timeline." The words of the then-leader of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command were perceived to be based on intelligence and dominated the discussions in Washington.

Last week, U.S. President Joe Biden's pick to be the next Indo-Pacom commander, Adm. Samuel Paparo, told Congress that the 2027 timeline is "nothing other than the 100th anniversary of the People's Liberation Army," and that the U.S. military, in general, always must be ready to respond.

Sponsored Content

About Sponsored Content This content was commissioned by Nikkei's Global Business Bureau.

Nikkei Asian Review, now known as Nikkei Asia, will be the voice of the Asian Century.

Celebrate our next chapter
Free access for everyone - Sep. 30

Find out more